Wednesday, January 6, 2016

The Oregon Standoff Reminds Me of the Republic of Texas Standoff. Here's Why.

I was NOT a part of the Republic of Texas Standoff (began on April 27, 1997, ending on May 4, 1997) even though the standoff occurred in the POA subdivision I live in and even though Rick McLaren, who led the RoT group out here, had been a friend of mine for many years--until I discovered his real agenda with the Republic of Texas movement, which was money laundering and gun running using the Washitaw Nation as proxy (the Washitaw Nation that exists around Monroe, Louisiana--home also to the show "Duck Dynasty"--was led by a bogus "Queen," "Dugdamoundya"). Then there was the fact that VERY FEW REAL TEXANS AND VIRTUALLY NO LOCALS in the local area around Jeff Davis County, Texas, and Fort Davis, supported this movement. Such that one could count the number of locals involved in the standoff on one finger: Rick McLaren himself.

Some of the folks who had backed the Republic of Texas were indeed Texans (I will not name names here...BTW McLaren was originally from Ohio!), but many folks who hung out in and around the "Republic of Texas Embassy" (that is, the Republic of Texas Embassy was in...the Republic of Texas aka the State of Texas located in the USA...I know, I know...)...but anyway, many folks who hung out around the Embassy were from other states and one was even from Canada ("White Eagle" Otto, a so-called "Meti" Indian...a Meti is half white, half-First Nations as they say in Canuk-land, who was indeed at McLaren's  hideout during the standoff). One of the folks at the Embassy (but not in the standoff) was a guy from Kansas whom a Kansas militia group had warned McLaren about but he ignored them until it was almost too late. In early December, McLaren kicked the "US Ambassador" out of the Embassy...and his wife and five kids out of a living place affiliated with the Embassy that McLaren had control over. In fact it would turn out later, before the standoff occurred, that at least half of the folks "supporting" McLaren were either FBI or ATF! (In addition, some of these infiltrators were also affiliated with Texas militias as well.)

The main point I am making though is that virtually no locals supported this movement at any time, and the few locals who did at some point support the notion of Texas secession basically stopped supporting McLaren when they learned the truth of what his real agenda was, stated above.

The gun running was done using Washitaw and some other militia groupings doing their operation out of a local airport (I was never able to get a good amount of details, since some of the gun runners were caught in late October, 1996.) The money laundering--White Eagle called the Embassy the "washateria"...I am not making this up!--was obvious...in October, 1996 the "Queen" of the Washitaw and others came out to the Embassy and made whatever deal to launder money in order to have enough money to create "Republic of Texas bucks" which they would use to buy guns as well as to pay off creditors, such as the small outfit in San Antonio that made "Republic of Texas badges" (a line from "Blazing Saddles" comes to mind here) that was paid in these "bucks" which of course was bogus money not exchangeable for anything, as a property owner out here found out when the RoT supporters from Arizona (no less) "bought" his lot with said "bucks" which were worthless. Things got so bad that the publisher of the "Republic of Texas Magazine" denounced McLaren for ripping off the badge makers and the "buyers" of said property for ripping off the previous owner (who got his property back not too long after the standoff occurred).

And another thing: why would locals (even of they thought secession might be a good idea, what with Clinton ruining the country and all) support a movement that was headed by an Ohio native and was at least half-non-Texan?

Of course there are huge differences between the Oregon standoff and the RoT standoff...the Oregon standoff is supposedly in support of the Hammond local ranching family's property rights against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and their ridiculous claim that Hammond deliberately set fire to BLM land (which they shouldn't be owning in the first place, but we live under what is called "Color of Law" meaning the govt, gets to pass whatever "law" they feel like passing for whatever pretext they feel like dealing with where by these "laws" have legal standing in a proper court...but what US, State, or local or appellate courts these days do have proper legal standing while under bogus ADMIRALTY LAW (indicated by that yellow trimming on American flags...and you do know that 501-c3 churches are REQUIRED to have this bogus flag in their buildings! Every Christian needs to question their Boards about why this bogus flag is in their church that is supposed to be headed by God's law, not some corporate entity that is still affiliated with THE MONARCHY OF BRITAIN! BTW, that is the main reason I stopped going to my local church...) that came about partially due to the criminal "Act of 1871" (which would also lead to CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP with your name in ALL CAPS on legal docs, Social Security cars, Birth Certificates, etc....as well as the Federal Reserve Bank and its enforcement arm, the IRS, etc.)

Here's the thing and the similarity between this and the Republic of Texas standoff: again we have "militia supporters" of the Hammonds, including Ammon Bundy of "Bundy Ranch Standoff" fame and a couple of others who were also at the Bundy Ranch and who supposedly tried to get the militia folks there to cause violence with BLM folks...one of these possible "trouble makers" is a bogus Special Forces guy who hates Muslims (I bet you the SPLC loves this one!). Some of these militia folks are occupying some shack-type building on the BLM land "for the duration" and others are staying at local motels. But as with the RoT standoff, NONE (not even one) of the standoff folks are locals, and not only that, but the Hammonds DID NOT REQUEST THEIR HELP and have disavowed the standoff folks!

So my guess is since the Hammonds (who will report to jail soon to serve their outlandish 4 or 5 year sentence for doing a good deed in keeping down a fire hazard...remember when it comes to the govt. no good deed goes unpunished...) did NOT ask for outside help, nor did any other local Hammond supporters in Harney County and Burns, Oregon, but Bundy and the others show up anyway, it is not about helping the Hammonds but about serving their own interests (or, as some are now supposing, setting up a false flag or a psy-op, considering Obama just gave his crapola speech about some illegal EO that some think will lead to gun confiscation...this standoff could lead to the tinderbox that could ignite Obama's excuse for Martial Law or whatever, and Bundy and Co. are being used to set up the American People).

And since the Hammonds and their friends do not support this standoff, neither do I. But I just hope none of the Bundy people does anything stupid.

Many patriots are complaining about Montel Williams and others wanting all these militia folks killed by BLM, or want these folks dead because they are white...folks, when it comes to BLMs there are no differences...who is more racist that "Black Lives Matter" black trash wanting to kill all the "crackers"?

But I have a suggestion for the militia folks at that building: put out an Israeli flag...that way, any doofus idiot liberal that thinks you all should be killed can be themselves castigated for being "anti-Semitic"! And you can bet Netanyahu would have a toodoo with the Congress he owns if any BLM folks try to take down that flag!

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

A Tale of Two BLMs: It's the Worst of Times; It's the Best of Times

Well, it's time for me to put in my two cents on the Hammond-Bundy-Militia business going on in Oregon...thus one of the two BLMs just so happens to be a government agency that Constitutionally is likely illegal...but of course that will never stop FedGov and the Spawn of Satan that controls it (until We the People get off our butts and stop it for them!...there I go again...wishful thinking, right? After all, too damned many of us are waiting for someone else to do the heavy lifting...) But anyway...

Under what is sometimes called "color of law" (which means there is enough ignorance of the real law to allow bogus "de facto law" to come into affect...few actually know what the law constitutes and most couldn't care less anyway until they find themselves in a FEMA Camp), the Fed Gov back I think (if I have my facts straight) in the 1800s began to take over western and also southern lands for whatever reason they could possibly conjure up and eventually created the "Bureau of Land Management" precisely as national debt was piling up. I do not think this is just a coincidence. And cut the crap about protecting some endangered species or "the environment",,,folks, do you really think a Maurice Strong or a George Soros actually gives a crap about, say, turtles or fish or even a tree-hugging tree worth hugging?

Folks, these folks are psychopaths. And you don't need a degree in Psychology (which I happen to have) or a Masters Degree in Counseling (which I also happen to have) and you don't need to read the DSM-V (which I have not read, but I've read the DSM-IV, so there!) to know what a psychopath is, or cataloged in the various DSMs as "Antisocial Personality Disorder" or "Narcissistic Personality Disorder" (why do you think I keep insisting that narcissists are wannabe psychopaths? Because even the Psych Eval industry says so...)

But back to why the Bureau of Land Management was created. Now the government can say whatever BS they want as to why it was created, because like I said it was created at about the time around the Civil War that FedGov was deep in debt to the banksters (you know, the Rothschilds...the Rockefellers and the rest came later) and what if they could not pay their debts back? Now this was when the US dollar was NOT a fiat currency and was backed by gold (but remember, the Rothschilds and their minions who later created the Federal Reserve Private Bank were just starting to get that ball rolling...why do you think Lincoln was so adamant about NOT creating a privately owned fiat currency? Say what you want about Lincoln: he was right about this one....and keep in mind all the Greenback and SageBrush Rebellions at that time). So I will cut to the chase: The BLM (or whatever they called it back then) was created so that under color of law and color of "saving wildlife and the environment" the government could either steal land to later sell off land to pay debt, or just hand it over as collateral.

And here is why, technically, We the People will have a very difficult time stopping this lawlessness: We the People DO NOT HAVE ALLODIAL TITLE to this land that we think we privately own...and the govt. has the force of arms to steal from us under, you guessed it, "color of law." (Remember, this means "the law" is what FedGov says it is!) And how do we know we do not have allodial title? Because if we had allodial title to our land, we wouldn't be paying property and school taxes, and the word "TENANT" wouldn't be on our "Warranty Deed" (or any Quit Claim Deed with a Warranty Deed that proceeded it). Folks, look at your deed and if you don't find TENANT or something similar on it, then either you actually own the land or the lady at the courthouse or realtor made a mistake. Do you pay property and school taxes? If you do, then you DO NOT ACTUALLY OWN YOUR LAND!

Now, who has Allodial Titles to land in the US? Railroads, Land Grant bodies (especially in Texas after the Republic of Texas was founded; many were done away with though after the Civil War and the so-called "Reconstruction" period when the banksters started stealing private land...Carpetbaggers and Scaliwags, dontcha know.). Trusts (owned by oligarchs, etc. and powerbrokers and maybe even original landowners from colonial times) and the like--and yes, the Queen of England and other European Aristocrats from colonial times as well (and the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, of course) and Native Tribal Nations (but not of course what they used to hold...most of their lands were just flat out stolen). In fact my husband went down to the courthouse one day many years ago requesting an Allodial Title and of course it was denied. In fact the land we live on is in fact owned Allodially by some railroad block that the ranch land that was sold to create the POA we live in was created out of back in the 1870s. (That is, even the ranchers here do NOT own the land they ranch on!)

Now as we all know FedGov is deep in debt, so deep to the Rothschilds etc. that the only way they can pay this debt back is to either steal under some pretext or another private lands, then sell as much previously privately owned US land as possible to pay back the debt, or just hand the land over to the Rothschilds, etc., which would make us, you guessed it, serfs or tenant farmers or sharecroppers. But if we don't like this situation we can move to cities and live in Stack and Packs, right? (No way, Jose...I am claustrophobic...Oops! Better retract that...the govt, might force me to give up some gun which I don't own or have or possess because "claustrophobia" is a "phobia" and a "phobia" is in the DSM V! Just wait until they put me in a FEMA Camp! Will I go bonkers? Nope, because they won't be putting me into a FEMA Camp, period!)

So, you see, that is why the BLM has put the Hammonds back in jail for the crime of improving the land by doing controlled burns (which just so happened to wind up burning an acre or two of BLM owned land...send these folks to the gallows!), when at the same time the BLM has burned cattle, homes, and thousands of acres because, well, they can (the same justification for cops killing babies and old ladies and disabled vets, among others--because they can. Just like Obama can claim to steal our guns while he sells guns to ISIS. Christians can't have guns, but Christian-killers can...don't you just love Barry boy, the "House N-word"? Maybe Samuel L, Jackson can reprise his roll in "Django Unchained" as Barry Boy in a movie...but will Quentin Tarantino be the Director?

Which leads me now to that other set of BLM thugs...the most racist pieces of trash since the KKK and the Neo-Nazis, "Black Lives Matter." Do these psychos, thugs, and black trash actually think killing off every last white person is going to solve their problems when it is the thuggish communists (and you thought I was going to use the word "liberals"...honey, liberals are too stupid to factor into this equation!) such as their "Dear Leader" Barry "the House N-Word" Obama who is using them for cannon fodder in the coming "Divide and Conquer" War for the Satanic New World Order? And another thing...how are these "Afro-American" idiots gonna handle their "Dear Leader" letting in millions of "darker-skinned white folks" from Mexico and Central America to compete with them for the title of most racist nation? And I can't wait to see Crips and/or Bloods in a war with MS-13... I wonder how God will sort these psychos out...