Wednesday, November 30, 2011

What Andrew Wilkow Really Said

So I listened Tuesday November 29 to Andrew Wilkow's actual broadcast instead of just reading his posts on his site Wilkow Majority where it seemed he was saying the Occupy Wall Street protesters nationwide had no right to protest.

Now he actually didn't say they had no right to protest during his talk Tuesday with some Weekly Standard writer named Matthew...I didn't catch his last name.

What Wilkow actually said was, and I paraphrase, that the Occupy protesters could theoretically protest but couldn't actually protest in practice because they did not have "permission" to protest by the owners of Zucotti Park, for instance.

That's like saying the Continental Army had no right to fight the American Revolution because the land owner of the land on which fighting was fought did not give them "permission" to fight on it!

Like I said, he's just another traitor in Constitutional clothing.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Right Wing Talk Hosts Violated Their Own Argument!

Whether it is neo-fascists like Bill O'Reilly, who never met a taser-wielding cop or authority figure he didn't praise, Wilkow or anyone else dissing the OWS protests--who claim to be against folks right to protest because those protesting are doing it on private property and are dirty hippies and whatever other pretext they have to denounce the US Constitution when anyone other than co-opted Tea Party or Islamophobes are exercising that right to protest. As if the Wall Street banks that ultimately own them own the streets of New York City as well...except when protesting a mosque or whatever...

So O'Reilly and his Fox News buddy anchor Kelly whatsername, who said pepper spray is a vegetable, claims that the cops have aright to be as brutal as possible to these "dirty hippie students" because these students are paying to go to UC Davis--or their parents are---okay, okay, I admit it...some of these students may be getting Pell Grants or scholarships...and thus since they are paying for the cops to brutalize them they should just shut up and let the cops brutalize them. After all, they are paying the salaries of the cops since they are paying tuition to go there, and that is why they should shut up and let the cops do their jobs that the students are paying them to do. You know, paying to eat their "vegetables"...

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Dear Occupy Wall Street: Here Is How You Can Really Win--Even the Right Wingers Will Support You

There are two reasons the right wingers do not support the OWS movement:

1. The left wingers DO support you! The right wingers make too much money on the backs of the ol' divide and conquer routine, but the fact is, the OWS movement will not succeed without the support of the Andrew Wilkows of the world (but don't even think of getting the support of the Glenn Becks...Beck actually endorsed Ron Paul at one time...I knew that support had to be bogus because a short time later he said he hated Ron Paul. Now he supports Michelle Bachmann, who has much much less chance of winning the nomination than Paul does. And don't forget how Beck screwed Debra Medina when she was running for governor of Texas!)

2. Too many "non-leader" leaders of OWS are anti-capitalist, that is, they favor socialism. Some are outright Marxists, and too many OWS supporters favor some sort of co-optation by unions like SEIU (I, for one thing, want nothing to do with anything SEIU is involved with, after seeing videos of SEIU thugs bullying voters and tea party supporters). If you want the support of MOST Americans not just the 30 or so percent that is jobless or loaded with student loan debt or has an underwater mortgage or just feels as if the "something for nothing" lifestyle is about to disappear, than you are gonna have to throw out the anti-capitalist meme some of you all have adopted.

I know of what I speak since I myself used to be a radical leftist...guys, working class people in the USA DO NOT WANT SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM, OR ANY COMBINATION OF THE TWO. I used to pass out leaflets with Marxist ideas, and man, did working class folks reject this stuff! Guys, this ain't Europe, and it won't be Europe no matter how much you wish it was Europe! President Obama is about as socialist as you all are gonna get!

Want to know why a fairly large minority of Americans are cheering the cops beating you up and pepper spraying you? A few cheer because they are just psychopaths underneath it all. Some cheer because they will cheer cops no matter what. Some cheer because they are too brainwashed by the Limbaughs and Hannitys of the world. Some cheer because they are just crusty old reactionaries. Some cheer because if even one leftist supports OWS, they can't support it no matter what. But I think most who cheer the cops, do so, because you all have invaded private property and they simply don't approve of that. Just like Wilkow has an article on his site about OWS in LA occupying you have the owner's permission?

Now I said in a previous article denouncing the right wing's anti-right-to-protest deal that the excuse they are using to denounce you is that you are all dirty hippies messing up private property (which is, of course, a pretext--they'd denounce you guys no matter what...after all they are owned by their corporate masters and your use of private property has nothing to do with it, right Andrew?). Now, I know not all of you are dirty hippies messing up private property, and that the right wing is using a broad brush to paint you.

But here is what you could have done:

1. Instead of occupying private property, you could have simply protested outside of Federal Reserve Banks (for one thing, uninformed folks like Wilkow think that the Fed banks are public property because "the government runs the Fed banks"...Wilkow doesn't know or won't admit the Fed banks are privately owned--and if Wilkow doesn't know, neither do most of his followers, who are denouncing you right now as I type). Occupying outside of Fed banks would also get the Ron Paulians on your side, and real libertarians as well. Right now, Ron Paul has lots of support.

2. Instead of occupying places like Zucotti Park you could have protested outside Bloomberg's place. What is wrong with protesting outside Gracie Mansion? Memo to Occupy DC folks...ever hear of the White House?

3. Instead of wasting you time protesting against the those who do the bidding of criminals, those "let 'em eat cake types" that live above your protests...stock brokers, hedge fund folks and the like who do as they are told by folks like Jamie Dimon, try protesting outside the mansions of those who actually have caused your problems. You protested outside Jamie Dimon's place, but then you left--you should have stayed, and done Ben Bernanke, Paulson, Larry Summers, Timmy Geitner, Rockefeller, etc. as well. By "inconveniencing" folks who work on Wall Street, all you are doing is pissing them off. Jamie Dimon could care less what you do to his underlings!

Come to think of it, why are you protesting Wall Street workers or even CEOs when what you really should be doing is getting a million or two outside Congress, outside the SEC, outside the Supreme Court and DEMANDING JAIL for these fraudsters??? 'Cos if anyone needs occupying it's Congress with its NINE PERCENT APPROVAL RATING!!!

You should be forcing Congress to force the court system to try these criminals and psychopaths for massive, economy-destroying fraud!

Oh, yeah! Congress won't do it because (as "Sixty Minutes" so wonderfully showed) Congress is in on the fraud!

So then! Maybe you all should get yourselves down to Washington DC...a couple of million of you, I know you can do front of the Capitol Building. Others of you locally can "occupy" in front of the homes of Congresspersons and Senators and send them a message as well.

Now, if the more reasonable right wing radio types like Wilkow see you protesting in front of Pelosi or Dodd or Frank or (wait for it...) Kucinich--and the left wing folks like Olbermann see you protesting in front of Beohner's or Bachmann's or McCain's or (God forbid) Ron/Rand Paul's...then I guarantee it


In my next post, I will present an even better idea!

'Cos right now you ain't...

Left Wing TV-Radio Talk Show Hosts are Traitors to the Consitution and Rule of Law! Period! End of Story!

And besides, they were against the Occupy Wall Street protesters before they were for them...typical leftists, eh?

Let's see...Rachel Maddow made fun of them before they "got serious," and stayed in Zucotti Park day after day after day, even when it rained? Even when cops were beating them up? Now, of course, Maddow says she "supports" the protesters--I guess her bosses at MSNBC told her she had to support OWS if she wanted to maintain her time slot.

But let us not forget that Maddow was part of the 1 percent and still is...can she actually be blamed for NOT supporting the protests at the beginning?

Now, as I said in my previous post about Andrew Wilkow and the rest of the right wing radio hosts who claim to uphold the Constitution--but only when Tea Party or Islamophobics are protesting--these folks would never come right out and say "these damned hippies" can't protest, so they denounce these folks as hippies instead, and say they leave their protest areas a mess--as if Tea Party protesters or anti-Muslim protesters leave their protest areas squeaky-clean! Further, when cops beat up these folks and pepper spray them, Wilkow, O'Reilly, Becvk and the others cheer on the cops. Who knows? Maybe Wilkow and the rest think these protesters are Palestinians in disguise!

Back to Maddow. Now, of course, she thinks it is perfectly fine to protest with OWS, and her fellows--Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann on MSNBC, and radio hosts Thom Hartmann, Sheila "Red Hot Liberal" Miller, Mark "I make Micheal Savage look tame" Malloy, and the rest of Sirius Left and any and all other "progressive" talk show hosts, as well. Good for them for standing up for Constitutionally-protected right to protest and exercise freedom of speech.

Too bad that when it comes to Tea Party protests, or anti-Muslim protests (such as that BS protest against the "World Trade Center Mosque"), or protests at "Town Hall" meetings of Democrats, these same folks who defend OWS denounce protests when right wingers do it!

While they denounced the Republican National Convention in St. Paul Minnesota back in 2008 for being "fascist" or whatever, they similarly denounced Ron Paul's "protest" Convention not far down the road, which pretty much got the Tea Party movement that the Tea Party has been co-opted by Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin and the rest of the Israel-firsters and neo-cons, they refuse to acknowledge that the movement Ron Paul started is now as pro-statist and anti-freedom as they are!

But no! Folks who want our borders secure from illegals of any country, folks who protest leftists wanting to take our guns away, folks who protest robbing from the productive folks to give to the "something for nothing" folks--ad I don't just mean welfare queens, either!--folks who think families who knowingly bought homes they could never pay off, or folks who get loans for college knowing they might never pay them back...when "right wingers" protest left-wingers wanting the government to force tax payers forced to pay back these bad loans because they debtors can't pay them back, by wanting taxes raised...dangit! If the left thinks it is okay for OWS to protest, but not Tea Party folks, then they are supporting the destruction of Constitutionally protected right to protest and freedom of speech--thus, leftists who think this way (and they pretty much all do!) are TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW!

Just like they hate wars that Republicans start but love wars--think Libya--that Democrats start...even though by now they ought to know that Libya is now run by...wait for Qaida! Which, of course, means that ten years from now "we" will be invading Libya again to remove al Qaida...

As smarmy as leftists are, they really do not believe in the right to protest unless it is some leftist (or union like the anti-freedom and racist SEIU), but they will never admit it because, after all, being leftist, they "know what is best" for the rest of us "unenlightened." Want proof? See how many of leftist and "anti-racist" folks come out to shout down protests by neo-Nazis.

Now, I despise the ideas and racism of neo-Nazis, Skinheads, Identity Christians and the like, but darn it, this is America and they have the right to protest just like OWS does! Just like Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn did when they protested the arrest of that rabbi who raped a young Jewish boy. Just like protesters in Israel...the Nazi-like settlers in the West Bank can protest Palestinians even if Palestinians can't protest back, just like Tel Aviv folks can protest the cost of hummus and cottage cheese there.

Leftists: the right to protest MEANS the right to protest. Period, End of Story.

Like the right wing talk show hosts you claim to defend the Constitution.

Start acting the part!

My next post will praise and criticize Occupy Wall Street, both, because while I support their right to protest maybe they ought to be doing something even more effective...getting out of the system!

Right-Wing Talk Radio Hosts Are Traitors to the Constitution, the Rule of Law. Period. End of Story.

Which Right-Wing Talk Show Radio Hosts are Traitors to the Constitution and the Rule of Law?

All of them!

Okay, okay...I have not heard pro-Ron Paul radio host Mike Church's opinion on Occupy Wall Street's right to protest and exercise Freedom of Speech like his Tea Party protest buddies (because Church is on radio from 5 am to 8 am and I simply do not wake up at those hours). But it would not surprise me if he did not support their right to protest because his "Sirius Patriot" (satellite radio) buddy, Andrew "We're right, they're wrong, and that's the end of the story" Wilkow, does not support their right to protest. And do not get me started on Bill "pepper spray is a vegetable" O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rusty Humphries, and Mark Levin....and hundreds of other supporters of the denial of Bill of Rights advocates on right wing radio.

But of course none of them comes right out and says they do not support "those damned hippies" right to peacefully protest because that would be sounding waaaay too hypocritical, so they come out with the same BS right wingers used to claim during Vietnam War protest--which, of course, some of these folks used to be a part of--such as "they leave the place a mess, they need showers, etc." Since they can't--they claim to stand for the Constitution, after all--demand that OWS stops protesting, they will vilify these protesters as much as possible and lie about them as much as possible. Meanwhile, they think it is okay for cops to beat them up and pepper spray them--but God forbid authorities in Muslim countries do the same thing!! Overthrow the bastards, Wilkow and his ilk might say...but those damned OWS protesters ought to be shot! Correct?

These folks, Wilkow, Hannity and the rest of 'em, are such TRAITORS to the rule of law that they make me want to be a leftist!

(Note: Since I used to actually be a leftist, there is no way I'm going back to being one...but the trash these right wing idiots say is enough to make most sane human beings want to be leftist...)

Don't believe that Wilkow, whom I used to think was one of the more sane right wing talk show hosts and listened to him almost every day, could be that anti-freedom of speech and anti-first amendment?

Then go here and click on the bottom of the page at his archives, and start reading the material he has posted. Every single article he uses on his show about OWS is negative. Folks, I realize that maybe OWS folks did leave a mess at Zucotti Park and did take advantage of the kindness of store and eatery owners letting them use the rest rooms, and they should have been held more to account over messes they left. But to call for rubber bullets, pepper spray, beatings and the like makes Wilkow and the others no better than the Brits in 1776--and their loyalist cronies--who probably said the same things about the Continental Army!

Further, since these folks refuse to support the right of their political opponents to exercise their first amendment right to protest and use freedom of speech, AT THE SAME TIME SUPPORTING THE RIGHT OF EGYPTIANS TO PROTEST IN TAHRIR SQUARE AND SYRIANS TO PROTEST AS WELL...AND OF COURSE THEY WILL ALWAYS SUPPORT ANY TEA PARTY PROTEST ESPECIALLY IF IT IS AGAINST MUSLIMS, these folks--all of them mentioned above and their wannabes on lesser programs, are TRAITORS to the Constitution they claim to uphold so dear. Because, as Emile Zola (who is a Jew, no?) once said: "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to my death your right to say it."

But no. Wilkow, who once claimed on radio (I heard him say) that he would love to be a Wall Street billionaire and that way he could screw the rest of us for not being enterprising enough...Wilkow, who is a follower of Ayn Rand, the same Ayn Rand who believes that the wealthy have to the right to rip off everyone else's wealth because they are not among "the elites"...Wilkow, who believes that Wall Street has the right to own our government because Wall Street creates most of the wealth of this if small businesses, farmers, ranchers, growers, factory workers, etc. etc. etc. have nothing to do with it...Wilkow, whp arrogantly claims "we're right, they're wrong, and that's the end of the story"... YOU, ANDREW WILKOW, WHO REFUSE TO SUPPORT THE RIGHT OF THOSE IN THE OCCUPY WALL STREET MOVEMENT TO EXERCISE FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND TO PROTEST PEACEFULLY, ARE A TRAITOR TO THE US CONSTITUTION!


Of course, Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly, Levin and the rest are far worse, but they are Israel-first, war mongering neocons, so that is to be expected. Thing is, I personally expected better from Andrew Wilkow, who ought to know better.

In my next post, I will skewer the left for the same reasons!

Friday, November 11, 2011

When Hope for the Future is Seemingly Lost, Remember the Elites are Insane Idiots!

Jim Quinn's recent post on Washington's Blog about having no shame is definitely worth reading even if you have no interest in the fate of Joe Paterno and Penn State's football program. But the article seems very pessimistic.

I may be one of the few bloggers on the insanity of the so-called "one percent" or "the elites" that actually is optimistic (Horse 237 of and Les Visibleis another) that the elites will lose, and lose badly, and We the People will win, despite all odds and no matter what the elites throw at us.

Some of the obvious reasons for my optimism are:

1. There a 7 billion or so of us and only about 10,000 of them. Yes, they presently control all sorts of armies and cops and mercs, but (other than the mercs anyway) even now members of the military and even cops are starting to turn against the elites. And, when mercenaries are no longer being paid what is requested--or whenever these folks grow a conscience (some will, most won't)--then they too will turn against the elites, Or perhaps they will sell their services to one branch of the elites against another branch.

2. Not everything about globalization is bad; consider that globalization has allowed more and more people than ever--pert near everyone on the planet--to instantly communicate over the internet, Twitter, Facebook, etc. This caused the so-called Arab Spring, which did some good in that it got millions in Egypt and elsewhere talking to each other, at least, and has been a boost to protests in the West, such as Occupy Wall Street. While I do not agree with some of the elements of OWS---those that blame capitalism, for instance, or those who refuse to acknowledge that government has no business in taking care of us--I do agree with their right to protest.

Side note: On the day of Sul Ross State University's Homecoming, October 29, 2011, the town in which it is located, Alpine, Texas (population about 5,000) had its own "Occupy" protest! There were perhaps 30 to 50 protesters on the main street corners shouting "We are the 99 percent!" I was astounded. Even small rural towns are doing it!

3. The elites have NEVER succeeded in their ultimate plans--enslavement of the rest of us and owning 100 percent of the wealth of Earth--and they won't this time, either. Considering these folks send their kids to Oxford or Harvard, belong to Skull & Bones and the Bilderbergers, and control about 90 percent of the world's wealth already, you'd think they would have studied history or mathematics. The longest empires have only lasted a couple of hundred years, mostly because empires tend to debase their currencies. When they debase their currencies the troops that maintain these empires for the elites soon enough realize they aren't paid what they ought to be paid and realize working for less and less for the sake of the elites simply isn't worth it. Then the elites have to hire mercenaries at exorbitant rates and if they don't pay what is demanded then you have military coups and the like. That is how, every fifty years or so, new imperial families took over in Rome. Things really got hairy in Rome after Commodus was assassinated around 200 AD or so (Commodus is the son of Marcus Aurellius, the last of the so-called "Five Good Emperors"). After that, the Emperorship was basically sold to the highest bidder. Just like the Presidency in the US: everyone knows that the Democrat or Republican that gets the most money from Wall Street and the banks gets to be the next president. Which, of course, will not alter the fact that the US empire is toast, whether or not "we" invade Iran.

Now it is possible that the US empire is being caused by the elites to fail, just as the European Union is being allowed to fail, just as the US dollar is being allowed to fail. That way, the elites can set up their own one world currency backed by a one world government. But a one world government and its currency must have unity of purpose THAT WILL APPEAL to the masses such that the masses will accept their enslavement, and even desire their enslavement. But--and the elites will never get it into their thick skulls--the only way this can happen is if they turn us into complete robots or zombies.

In a previous post I discussed the 1927 Fritz Lang masterpice movie, "Metropolis," with its virtually impossible caste system of the rich above ground and the workers below ground in perpetuity servicing the machines for the rich. NO ONE WOULD EVER AGREE TO LIVE THIS WAY!! Just like an idea that floats around on conspiracy sites on the internet--FEMA will take over all the abandoned houses in the US and turn these busted subdivisions into concentration camps for the masses who can't pay their debts or some such so that FEMA completely controls their lives--guys, this won't work, not even if you put Prozac into the water! At some point, reality does seep through to the masses and they rebel against what has been done to them.

But of course, reality is something the elites have no clue about because they don't have to live in reality.


For who are the truly insane on Planet Earth?

It is the elites. For thousands of years, from the time history began, the elites have been doing the same thing over and over again expecting that this time it'll work.

But Sumeria fell. But Egypt fell. But the Hittites, Elamites, Edomites, Moabites, Canaanites, Israelites (or as some say, Hyksos), Assyrians, Babylonian, Persians and Medes, Greeks, Romans, Spartans, the various Chinese, Aryan, Mongolian, Teutonic, Islamic, Holy Roman Empire, Byzantine, Ottoman, Spaniard, Portugese, Dutch, Prussian, Russian, French, British, Nazi, Shogun, Militarist...fell, and that is now happening to the American as well.

So now the elites want to set up their own little one world government empire doing it the same ol' way it's always been done.

Expecting different results. Ain't gonna happen, Rothschild. Ain't gonna happen.