Syd Vicious is dead, right? Or is it Johnny Rotten? Or some other Sex Pistol? Remember that Nancy Spungeon biz back several years ago? Well, that's what I refer to. Yeah, I know--you aren't supposed to end a sentence with "to."
But anyway... I saw a Video of some of the events relating to the riots in London set against the background music of the Sex Pistols' song, "Anarchy in the UK."
Now, if the riots had started in Brixton, we'd be hearing their song, "The Guns of Brixton."
I could barely make out the lyric. Why, oh why, don't singers these days actually sing their words so you can figure them out without having to download the printed lyric? Yeah, I get it, the words say the singer is an anarchist. But aren't all rock singers (okay, okay, Ted Nugent is a neoconservative twit...)
But anyway, these rioters are burning their homes? Why? Supposedly, the riots had since spread to Hackney. Now I've actually seen Hackney--walking--yes, I said walking--after all it was mid-afternoon so no danger--walking through Stepney and Whitechapel to get there. A friend and I who were "student visitors" through a mostly college-sponsored-study abroad program (I had just graduated HS and this was a graduation gift) had gotten off the "tube" at Bow Road (where the "great bells of Bow" are...you know the ditty about farthings and St. Martins, but anyway...), which is near Stepney and Whitechapel. Now, if you've never read Dickens or saw the movie "To Sir with Love" you may not know that Stepney and Whitechapel are in what's calll the East End of London and are considered "slums" by western standards. That is where they speak "Cockney." So, we walk through those districts and eventually, walking toward the north, we get to Hackney. Then, Hackney was pretty much loaded with high rise apartment dwellings (called "Tower Estates" in England). The place was called "Trelawney Estates." Why were we there? Because my friend (who is Jewish, BTW) had relatives there...her mother's family was originally from England and this family we visited were an aunt and a cousin. The aunt was home and soon enough the son came home as well--he worked for British Rail. I don't remember if she worked. The apartment--four rooms--was somewhat cramped but definitely NOT slum-ish. this was in 1970.
Sometime in the mid-90s I read something in a magazine about how Hackney was now a slum. I was hoping these folks had moved out by then. They were very nice people.
But anyway...the riots had moved to Hackney and now I was really hoping these nice folks (she might be in her 80s and he in his 60s by now) were nowhere near this stuff!
There are two schools of thought on these events. One is that these mostly young folks who have been mostly poorly schooled, they say, and have no prospects, supposedly--as well as the so-called fact that they are mostly non-white, which is debateable since the riots are now spreading north...if they hit Tyneside, then "non-white" is BS because places like Newcastle are still mostly white...Geordies don't cotton to outsiders if you know what I mean, unless they can help Newcastle United (which was recently relegated down) get back to the Premier League! But anyway...The other school of thought--which of course makes a lot more sense--is that Cameron and the Met Police deliberately held back for a day or so in order that the mostly poor folks in Tottenham, Enfield and the rest would burn their homes and loot their shops and so on so that now they'd be homeless and the object of blame by the middle class, who would proceed to call for martial law and other draconian measures, which, of course, the power elites would happily oblige!
Yet, this would also mean that the man whom the cops shot, Duggan, shot him deliberately knowing that this would causes riots and burnings and lootings and what not. Which sounds like the notion that the "illuminati" did "weather modification" in the Gulf in August 2005 setting up Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans, which would lead residents still there (because they didn't have cars) to loot the place, which brought about martial law there. Some think that is what happened. But, if the "illuminati" were really smart--they aren't, but they think they are--they would have sent a weather modified hurricane on Houston, Texas, which is a lot bigger and a lot badder. Oh! Wait! They DID try that! But Hurricane Rita didn't exactly follow their flight plan, and hit SW Louisiana instead.
Sometimes God allows those dimwits to carry out their plans, and sometimes He doesn't.
But anyway...There is no martial law in England as I write this, and their probably won't be, despite various trolls in online-newspaper forums calling for such...and shame on you, Nigel Farage! Are you too stupid to see what the power elites are trying to do?
So my question is: will they try this in the US?
Now we all know (okay, we think we know!) that Americans won't protest anything, right? Isn't that what my previous post was about--WHY Americans are not protesting and rioting? And didn't I say that was likely a good thing? And, of course, if there is rioting and protesting it'll be over some racial thing...Rodney King and all that. We all know how the power elites here have run their "divide and conquer" thing, and how the left and right continue their "divide and conquer" dog and pony show: while one said blames "Tea Party" folks for the recession the other side blames "big govt. liberals and welfare queens." Folks, this ain't gonna end, but it doesn't have to.
And we all know--even those of us who act like we don't know--I'll get to that more in a minute--that the powers that be are doing their best to loot the country as I write...cut Social Security and Medicare and Food Stamps and Medicaid and loot 401Ks and the like, including not paying Federal employees...we know all this will happen, "Super Congress" or not. Heck, my 70-something mother-in-law knows it, and she still watches CNN and FOX! But she STILL knows it!
That is what I mean by those who "don't act like they think they know, but they know." I realize there are CIA-connected bloggers (even if they aren't CIA, they are CIA for all practical purposes because they are carrying out the agenda) that want all of us who know what's going on to think that "the masses" don't know what's going on--I used to think this, too! But no longer. When Rasmussen takes a poll and over 80 percent of "likely voters" (that means folks who are between 30 and 70 years old, in other words, representing about 250 million Americans or about 70 percent of the population--there's that 70 percent again!) say that Congress doesn't represent them and Obama's satisfaction numbers are way down, then you know that MOST AMERICANS GET IT!
Funny, but on the way back from a shopping trip we had NPR on, and these (use any perjorative term you wish here) were actually saying that "random" Americans loved what Obama was doing and why is everyone so upset? They solved the debt ceiling thing, after all! Okay, okay: we ought to thank Obama and Congress for destroying the Constitution with the Super Congress and making sure that money we have put into Social Security and Medicare our entire lives will NEVER be given back to us!!! Thank you, sirs, may I have another! Now, that's the spirit, NPR! Take my advice and go back to North Korea, please!
But anyway...they are idiots, but unfortunately, they are also criminals and psychopaths. Unfortunately for them, that is! Criminals? Guess what, stupids! NO CRIMINAL HAS EVER COMMITTED THE PERFECT CRIME! Since you are too stupid to understand why, I will tell you: because one of you idiots will rat on the others to the point where no synchophantic media will be able to hide this one; either that or you all will eat your own until you consume yourselves. Or, maybe, just maybe, some of you will go to jail while the angry populace either hangs, burns, shoots, or dismembers the rest of you--and your families! And your dogs, cat, birds, tigers and any other exotic pets your trillionaires have. "Grilled Evelyn" (de Rothschild, that is) and "Baked Lynn Forrester" just might become the meal de jour one of these days...but I jest, of course. Or maybe, just maybe, one (or more) of you will grow a conscience and stop this death and destruction. The more the merrier.
Psychopaths? Probably more than they are criminals, even. In the unlikely event that one of more of them DOES grow a conscience that automatically disqualifies this or these power elites from being psychopaths. For, to be a psychopath one must not have a conscience! But, to not have a conscience means also that one not has a heart and a soul, and that also means they do not have a clue as to the consequences of their actions. That is right: THESE PSYCHOPATH POWER ELITES HAVE NO CLUE AS TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS! THAT IS BECAUSE THEY THINK THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES FOR THEM!
But, there are. Yet, because they are psychopaths, they have no clue...it is mutually exclusive, like an oxymoron. Psychopaths CANNOT see/feel/hear/taste/smell/understand consequences. It is a vicious circle...they are psychopaths because they don't understand consequences and they don't understand consequences because they are psychopaths. It isn't just that they do not live the way the rest of us do, or that they (because they are insulated int heir own enclaves) do not know anyone that is outside their group. IT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE PSYCHOPATHS!!! AND CRIMINALS!!! AND IDIOTS!!!
One more thing: all that money you power elites are robbing from the world's people? Don't you dimwits know that you are going to die soon and that YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU???
Enjoy your trillions in loot, Dave Rockefeller...you're what, 90 now? How much longer you got? Five years, maybe? Now, you, Goerge Soros? Oh...twenty more years or so. But you can loot double what you've looted by now and guess what? When you die you'll be as poor as the rest of us.